In the news today, Smiley has noticed a lot of fuss about the painting known 
as Head of a man, is not actually a painting by the artist Vincent Van Gough. The painting formerly valued at $5 million AUD, for being a work of Van Gough’s has now been revalued as ‘virtually worthless’ I can certainly understand the frustration of people wanting to revalue it, but calling tha painting virtually worthless. Unknown Artist would Roll in his grave, as shallow as it may or may not be.
This painting, with all this coverage, could no longer be called worthless, it was mistaken for a Van Gough for so long for Fucks sake, the painter obviously needs to get credit for that at least. I think it is just the ill will of the news press calling it virtually worthless. This now Van Gough wannabe, is the most known pauitning of the moment and should get a few quid for it.
On other news relating to the News report of the painting, this really bigged me, and Iit is something I am emo about. On the seven news report, I really couldn’t get over how the reporter kept saying Van Gough name not as how it is meant to be said which sounds like Van Go, but rather Van Goff. This just reaffirms my belief that people at Seven news are pretty much Mindless morons.
- Love From Smiley.
